<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Choice Matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.choicematters.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.choicematters.org</link>
	<description>The website of Westchester Coalition for Legal Abortion - Choice Matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:53:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Komen Foundation: an Apology, Not a Reversal</title>
		<link>http://www.choicematters.org/2012/02/the-komen-foundation-an-apology-not-a-reversal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.choicematters.org/2012/02/the-komen-foundation-an-apology-not-a-reversal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Items]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brinker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[komen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mammogram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pink hand gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pink handgun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planned parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prochoice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reversal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choicematters.org/?p=1067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When an Apology is Just an Apology The Apology Although the Komen Foundation has apologized, it has not actually reversed its decision. It will honor grants to which Komen has previously committed to for 2012 but it does not say anything about future funding. Komen Foundation founder Nancy Brinker said, “Amending our criteria will ensure [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>When an Apology is Just an Apology</strong></p>
<p><strong>The Apology</strong><br />
Although the Komen Foundation has apologized, it has not actually reversed its decision. It will honor grants to which Komen has previously committed to for 2012 but it does not say anything about future funding.</p>
<p>Komen Foundation founder Nancy Brinker said, “Amending our criteria will ensure that politics has no place in our grant process. We will continue to fund existing grants, including those of Planned Parenthood, and preserve their eligibility to apply for future grants, while maintaining the ability of our affiliates to make funding decisions that meet the needs of their communities.” This battle is far from over.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/03/susan-g-komen-planned-parenthood_n_1252651.html?1328286773&amp;icid=maing-grid7|maing11|dl1|sec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D132483">The Huffington Post</a> points out, Komen&#8217;s apology is not a promise to renew Planned Parenthood grants. It simply says, &#8220;continue to fund existing grants&#8221; to the organization &#8212; which it had already planned on doing &#8212; and to make it eligible for future grants. At no point in the press release does Brinker promise that Komen will renew grants to Planned Parenthood.”</p>
<p><strong>The Explanantion</strong><br />
The Komen Foundation claimed the reason it had cut Planned Parenthood funding was because it had established new criteria for grant giving and that it would no longer give grants to organizations under investigation by local, state or federal governments.</p>
<p>The problem with that explanation is that the Komen Foundation currently gives $7.5 million in grants to the Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center for cancer research; and as we all know, Penn State is under investigation. That grant would appear to violate  that new rule at Komen. (Mother Jones.) Oops.</p>
<p><strong>Playing Politics with Women&#8217;s Health</strong><br />
There is no question that the Susan G. Komen Foundation’s decision to cut funding to Planned Parenthood was politically motivated.</p>
<p>It allowed political pressure—apparently coming from high up in its own organization—to betray its own 501(c)3 mission “<em>&#8230;working together to save lives</em>”.  The Komen Foundation launched an all-out attack on poor, young and uninsured women when it announced that it was cutting all grants to Planned Parenthood. This grant money was used by Planned Parenthood for cancer screenings.</p>
<p>This action was apparently taken at the direction of some right-wing extremist senior staff and board member.</p>
<p>In April 2011, Komen hired Karen Handel to be its new senior vice president for public policy. Handel’s extremist positions were not a secret. Handel had run unsuccessfully in 2010, on the Republican line, for governor of Georgia. Describing herself as a <em>pro-life</em> <em>Christian</em>, she ran on a platform to cut all public funding to Planned Parenthood even for non-abortion-related health services.</p>
<p>In addition, Nancy Brinker who is the founder of Komen, is <a href="http://motherjones.com/mojo/2012/02/komen-founder-republican-donor" target="_blank">a former Bush administration official</a>, and we all remember the rabid anti-choice agenda of the Bush years. She is a major contriubtor to Republican officials.</p>
<p>Some Komen staff resigned after the decision was made in December.</p>
<p><strong> The War on Women</strong><br />
Komen’s willingness to cut funding to Planned Parenthood highlights the ease with which a direct assault on women—particularly the poor, young and uninsured—can be launched.</p>
<p>The majority of those served by Planned Parenthood are uninsured. Unlike many private doctors, Planned Parenthood does not turn the poor and uninsured away.</p>
<p>Komen’s funding cuts would have directly attacked the wellbeing of the most vulnerable women. It was the Komen Foundation’s version of the Hyde Amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.choicematters.org/2012/02/the-komen-foundation-an-apology-not-a-reversal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coming to a Town Near You &#8211;The Truth about Crisis Pregnancy Centers</title>
		<link>http://www.choicematters.org/2012/01/coming-to-a-university-near-you-the-truth-about-crisis-pregnancy-centers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.choicematters.org/2012/01/coming-to-a-university-near-you-the-truth-about-crisis-pregnancy-centers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Items]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astorino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crisis pregnancy center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westchester]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choicematters.org/?p=1050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RH Reality has done an excellent job pulling the curtain back on crisis pregnancy centers. These are the centers that Westchester&#8217;s Right to Life County Executive, Rob Astorino, has welcomed into our County. He has stood at the ribbon cutting ceremonies, cheering as these organizations that are intentionally dishonesty, deceive the women of Westchester.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/FJXRVA16Kig" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>RH Reality has done an excellent job pulling the curtain back on crisis pregnancy centers.<br />
These are the centers that Westchester&#8217;s Right to Life County Executive, Rob Astorino, has welcomed into our County. He has stood at the ribbon cutting ceremonies, cheering  as these organizations that are intentionally dishonesty, deceive the women of Westchester. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.choicematters.org/2012/01/coming-to-a-university-near-you-the-truth-about-crisis-pregnancy-centers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Background on Abortion for Trust Women Week</title>
		<link>http://www.choicematters.org/2012/01/background-on-abortion-for-trust-women-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.choicematters.org/2012/01/background-on-abortion-for-trust-women-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Items]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-choice Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guttmacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust women week]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choicematters.org/?p=1043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; There will always be women who need access to abortions. Abortion is basic health care for women. 1 in 3 American women will have had an abortion by age 45. About 50% of pregnancies in the U.S. are unintended. 4 in 10 unintended pregnancies are terminated by abortion. In 2008, 1.21 million abortions were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/rY-bQ6UzhNI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>There will always be women who need access to abortions.</strong><br />
<strong> Abortion is basic health care for women.</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>1 in 3 American women will have had an abortion by age 45.</li>
<li>About 50% of pregnancies in the U.S. are unintended.</li>
<li>4 in 10 unintended pregnancies are terminated by abortion.</li>
<li>In 2008, 1.21 million abortions were performed in US.</li>
<li>Teen pregnancy accounts for only 2 in 10 of all abortions<br />
performed in the US.</li>
<li>Women in their twenties account for more than half of all<br />
abortions performed in the US.</li>
<li>88% of abortions occur in the 1<sup>st</sup> 12 weeks. Only<br />
1.5% occur later in the term.</li>
<li>6 in 10 women having abortions already have one or more<br />
children.</li>
<li>These women often cite the need to care for their children as a primary reason for choosing to have  an abortion.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Catholics support birth control and have abortions.</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>“<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensus_fidelium" target="_blank"> Sensus fidelium </a>—the graced and experience-fed wisdom of the faithful that has always been one of the sources of truth in the Catholic tradition.”</li>
<li><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/14/us-most-catholic-women-us-use-birth-cont-idUSTRE73D4SZ20110414" target="_blank">98% of sexually active Catholic women have used a </a><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/14/us-most-catholic-women-us-use-birth-cont-idUSTRE73D4SZ20110414" target="_blank">form of contraception</a> banned by the Catholic Church.</li>
<li>As recently as <a href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/4fa389e8#/4fa389e8/1">1968, a majority of the Pope’s advisors agreed</a> that there was no pastoral reason to ban Catholics from using contraception.<br />
<a href="http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/news/op-eds/2011/OnfamilyplanningdoestheCatholicChurchrepresentCatholics.asp">http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/news/op-eds/2011/OnfamilyplanningdoestheCatholicChurchrepresentCatholics.asp</a><a href="http://www.catholicsforchoice.org/news/op-eds/2011/OnfamilyplanningdoestheCatholicChurchrepresentCatholics.asp">.asp</a></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://oursilverribbon.org/blog/?p=630">  Read More, click here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.choicematters.org/2012/01/background-on-abortion-for-trust-women-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kicking Off 2012 with a Bang!  Trust Women Week &amp; Our National Online March !</title>
		<link>http://www.choicematters.org/2012/01/kicking-off-2012-with-a-bang-trust-women-week-our-national-online-march/</link>
		<comments>http://www.choicematters.org/2012/01/kicking-off-2012-with-a-bang-trust-women-week-our-national-online-march/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roe v wade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual march]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choicematters.org/?p=1036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Join Our National Online March for Reproductive Health, Rights and Justice January 20-27 Join the March Now! (Click Here) Choice Matters—together with over 41 other national and local organizations across the country—is participating in Trust Women Week this January 20-27, organized by the Trust Women /Silver Ribbon Campaign and MoveOn. We will organize one million [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><strong>Join Our National Online March</strong><br />
<strong>for Reproductive Health, Rights and Justice<br />
January 20-27</strong></div>
<div>
<p><a title="http://choicematters.us4.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=9caf7aed7f43779a3fe6e04eb&amp;id=08ebcefddf&amp;e=5e5b5674f5" href="http://choicematters.us4.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=9caf7aed7f43779a3fe6e04eb&amp;id=08ebcefddf&amp;e=5e5b5674f5"><strong title="http://choicematters.us4.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=9caf7aed7f43779a3fe6e04eb&amp;id=08ebcefddf&amp;e=5e5b5674f5">Join the March Now!</strong></a><br />
(<a title="http://choicematters.us4.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=9caf7aed7f43779a3fe6e04eb&amp;id=a76cac0a50&amp;e=5e5b5674f5" href="http://choicematters.us4.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=9caf7aed7f43779a3fe6e04eb&amp;id=a76cac0a50&amp;e=5e5b5674f5"><strong title="http://choicematters.us4.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=9caf7aed7f43779a3fe6e04eb&amp;id=a76cac0a50&amp;e=5e5b5674f5">Click Here</strong></a>)</p>
<p><a title="http://choicematters.us4.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=9caf7aed7f43779a3fe6e04eb&amp;id=e4e702bcd9&amp;e=5e5b5674f5" href="http://choicematters.us4.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=9caf7aed7f43779a3fe6e04eb&amp;id=e4e702bcd9&amp;e=5e5b5674f5"><br title="http://choicematters.us4.list-manage2.com/track/click?u=9caf7aed7f43779a3fe6e04eb&amp;id=e4e702bcd9&amp;e=5e5b5674f5" /></a>Choice Matters—together with over 41 other national and local organizations across the country—is participating in <strong>Trust Women Week this January 20-27,</strong> organized by the Trust Women /Silver Ribbon Campaign and MoveOn. We will organize one million people in a <em><strong>Virtual March</strong></em> to demand that local, state and federal elected officials <strong>trust women</strong>to make our own decisions about our bodies and our lives.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p><em><strong>The Virtual March’s mission</strong></em><strong><em> is Choice Matters’ mission</em></strong><strong>:</strong> Keep abortion legal and ensure that <em>all</em> <em>women</em>, regardless of age, race, class, status, geography or ability to pay, have full, unimpeded access to reproductive health care.</p>
<p>MoveOn will alert its 6 million members that on the 39<sup>th</sup> anniversary of <em>Roe v. Wade, </em>a million women and men will express their support for the human rights of women that are callously disregarded by anti-woman politicians across the country. Choice Matters will send out an action alert for steps you can take to stand up for women during <strong>Trust Women Week – January 20-27.</strong></p>
<p>We will show our numbers on an online map.  This will enable us to include the many who can not travel, or are frightened away by the <a title="http://choicematters.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9caf7aed7f43779a3fe6e04eb&amp;id=a475aafc1a&amp;e=5e5b5674f5" href="http://choicematters.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9caf7aed7f43779a3fe6e04eb&amp;id=a475aafc1a&amp;e=5e5b5674f5">extreme violence of anti-choice extremists. </a></p>
<p>Together we will build solidarity and momentum in support of women&#8217;s rights, equality and autonomy; access to comprehensive health care, including reproductive health care services; and reproductive justice.</p>
<p>Every week <em>should be</em> Trust Women Week but, sadly, we know that is not the case.</p>
<p><a title="http://choicematters.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9caf7aed7f43779a3fe6e04eb&amp;id=259e8dbc24&amp;e=5e5b5674f5" href="http://choicematters.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9caf7aed7f43779a3fe6e04eb&amp;id=259e8dbc24&amp;e=5e5b5674f5">Congress and state legislatures across the country </a>have laid siege to women’s rights, launching an all-out-war on women! In 2011, the 50 states combined enacted a record number of abortion restrictions.  Legislators introduced over 1,100 reproductive health and rights-related provisions, up from the 950 in 2010; 135 of these were enacted in 36 states, an increase from the 89 enacted in 2010 and 77 in 2009.  Of these, 92 restrict access to abortion services.  This is a record breaking increase over any previous year. The U.S. House of Representatives jumped in, passing legislation attacking women from every direction—cutting funding to Planned Parenthood; passing H.R. 358 which literally allows hospitals to let women die rather than perform an abortion that would save the woman’s life; eliminating insurance coverage; and more.</p>
</div>
<div><a title="http://choicematters.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9caf7aed7f43779a3fe6e04eb&amp;id=d96b7d44bf&amp;e=5e5b5674f5" href="http://choicematters.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9caf7aed7f43779a3fe6e04eb&amp;id=d96b7d44bf&amp;e=5e5b5674f5">Please pass this alert on to your friends and allies,<br title="http://choicematters.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=9caf7aed7f43779a3fe6e04eb&amp;id=d96b7d44bf&amp;e=5e5b5674f5" />and join the March now! (click here!)</a></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.choicematters.org/2012/01/kicking-off-2012-with-a-bang-trust-women-week-our-national-online-march/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hats Off to a Legend, Suzi Oppenheimer!</title>
		<link>http://www.choicematters.org/2012/01/hats-off-to-a-legend-suzi-oppenheimer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.choicematters.org/2012/01/hats-off-to-a-legend-suzi-oppenheimer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Items]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aboriton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppenheimer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westchester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choicematters.org/?p=1025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Suzi Oppenheimer” A Name Synonymous with Women’s Rights New York State Senator Suzi Oppenheimer has announced that she will be retiring at the end of 2012.We—the women of this state—will miss her greatly!Suzi has been at the forefront fighting for the women of Westchester and New York State for almost three decades.Suzi has battled tirelessly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.choicematters.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/oppenheimer3.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-1026 alignleft" title="oppenheimer3" src="http://www.choicematters.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/oppenheimer3-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong>“Suzi Oppenheimer”<br />
<em>A Name Synonymous with Women’s Rights</em></strong></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">New York State Senator Suzi Oppenheimer has announced that she will be retiring at the end of 2012.We—the women of this state—will miss her greatly!Suzi has been at the forefront fighting for the women of Westchester and New York State for almost three decades.Suzi has battled tirelessly against Senate anti-choice bills, making all women’s needs her concern. Her floor speeches in favor of Medicaid funding are legendary. She has fought annually for family planning and teen pregnancy prevention programs.</p>
<p>Choice Matters has been proud to endorse Senator Suzi Oppenheimer in every election since her initial run for the New York State Senate. In 1982, she came close, making Choice a focal point of her campaign; in 1984 she closed the deal with the voters.</p>
<p>In 1984, when she ran against anti-choice Perone, Suzi made her position on government’s proper role in abortion clear, saying, “Government has no more right to decide whether a woman may have an abortion than it has the right to tell us where we can’t live, whom we can’t marry, or what religion we can’t practice.”  She stressed the need not only to protect our freedom of choice, but to protect the safety of abortion as well. “Abortion has been with us for thousands of years, and no law will stop it now. Since the Supreme Court has already affirmed the right of a woman to choose abortion, it is now our duty not just to protect that right, but to protect the health and safety of all women who do decide they must have an abortion.”</p>
<p><strong>Suzi, we hold our glasses high in a toast to you.</strong></p>
<p>You have set the bar very high, and we thank you for that too!</p>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.choicematters.org/2012/01/hats-off-to-a-legend-suzi-oppenheimer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Choice Matters’ 2011 Chicken of the Year Award</title>
		<link>http://www.choicematters.org/2012/01/choice-matters%e2%80%99-2011-chicken-of-the-year-award/</link>
		<comments>http://www.choicematters.org/2012/01/choice-matters%e2%80%99-2011-chicken-of-the-year-award/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 16:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Items]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astorino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinic access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang of six]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westchester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choicematters.org/?p=1015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Choice Matters’ 2011 Chicken of the Year Award Goes to The Gang of Six —Democratic County Legislator John Nonna and five of his fellow Democratic Legislators—for sitting down when they should have stood up! After months of discussion, review, and dissection, the Clinic Access Bill—that would ensure women safe access to reproductive health centers—was voted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.choicematters.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/tumblr_ku48goxoYS1qatg16o1_4001.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-thumbnail wp-image-1019" title="tumblr_ku48goxoYS1qatg16o1_400" src="http://www.choicematters.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/tumblr_ku48goxoYS1qatg16o1_4001-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong>Choice Matters’ 2011 Chicken of the Year Award Goes to</strong><br />
<em> <strong>The Gang of Six</strong></em><br />
<strong>—Democratic County Legislator John Nonna and five of his fellow Democratic Legislators—for sitting down when they should have stood up!</strong></div>
<p>After months of discussion, review, and dissection, the Clinic Access Bill—that would ensure women safe access to reproductive health centers—was voted out of Committee and sent to the Westchester County Board of Legislators for a vote.</p>
<p>All that was expected of the legislators was a vote.  A simple up or down vote.  Vote &#8220;YES&#8221; and we know that you stand <strong>with</strong> the women of Westchester; vote &#8220;N0&#8243; and we know you are <strong>against</strong> us. Really, that simple.</p>
<p><em>The Gang of Six </em>had the opportunity to join with other Democratic and Republican legislators to vote to protect the safety of women entering and exiting reproductive health centers.  But, they chickened out.</p>
<p><strong>What did this Democratic <em>Gang of Six</em> do instead?</strong> After <em>three long hours</em> of a Public Hearing, primarily by people who believe the fetus is more important than the woman and who have clearly never heard of the separation of Church and State, John Nonna &#8211; with his gang’s support &#8211;<em>recommitted </em>the Bill. To <em>recommit</em> is basically a procedural move used to avoid a vote.  The Bill is sent back to Committee where it can easily be allowed to &#8221;die&#8221;, perhaps never seeing the light of day again.  It is &#8220;again&#8221; because the last time that happened was more than a decade ago!!!</p>
<p><strong>Make no mistake about it</strong>—this move by <em>The Gang of Six</em> to avoid a public vote was as much an anti-choice vote as any taken in Congress. <em>The Gang of Six</em> denied Westchester’s women safe passage to accessing our constitutionally recognized rights to reproductive health care.</p>
<p><strong>And the women of Westchester know <em>The Gang of Six</em> voted against women and are anti-choice. </strong>Since our last email we have received innumerable calls demanding to know when these Democrats became anti-choice&#8211;And by the way, that&#8217;s the way we see it too.</p>
<p>This Gang of Democrats has made a very poor calculation and unwise decision. This Gang thinks we will not broadcast their actions because they are Democrats.</p>
<p><strong>WRONG!</strong><br />
Choice Matters is a <strong>non-partisan</strong> organization and very proud of that fact. We hold <strong>all</strong> candidates and elected officials accountable, regardless of party affiliation and will continue to do so.</p>
<p>When the Republican-led House of Representatives passed legislation to let women die on a hospital floor rather than perform an abortion procedure that would save her life, we told you how many Republicans <em>and</em> Democrats voted in support of this anti-woman legislation.</p>
<p>Choice Matters will not protect legislators who turn their back on a woman’s right to choose.</p>
<p><strong>What you should know about <em>The Gang of Six</em>:</strong> 1). Each of these six legislators had previously committed to supporting clinic access legislation; 2). Each of these legislators is male and a Democrat; and 3). Three of these legislators were not re-elected.</p>
<p><strong>We Challenge You,<br />
Westchester County Board of Legislators!</strong><br />
There is a majority of County Legislators who claim to be pro-choice. If they are truly pro-choice, they must bring this legislation to the floor for a vote immediately.</p>
<p>We will then see who stands with us, and who stands against us.</p>
<p>If they do not bring it to the floor, or they voted against it, we will find candidates to challenge these legislators. We have no use for empty suits!</p>
<p>More than a decade ago, Senator Andrea Stewart Cousins and Assemblyman Tom Abinanti, then County Legislators, fought to ensure that women had safe access to women&#8217;s reproductive health centers. Unfortunately, they were not successful.</p>
<p>It took us more than ten years to get to this point, and our “leaders” ignored us, turning back the clock.  No one can blame the Right-to-Life County Executive.  It didn’t even get to his desk!</p>
<p><strong>For the record</strong>, 1. The Bill was carefully reviewed to make sure that it was 100% in compliance with First Amendment rights – for all parties involved; and, 2. There is no other law&#8211;not state or federal&#8211;that presently protects Westchester&#8217;s women&#8217;s safety as they enter health centers.</p>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<strong>We are putting you on notice,<br />
County Legislators:<br />
Stand up for the women of Westchester, or get replaced!!</strong></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.choicematters.org/2012/01/choice-matters%e2%80%99-2011-chicken-of-the-year-award/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Westchester Residents Beware &#8211; Astorino&#8217;s Version of a Reformer</title>
		<link>http://www.choicematters.org/2011/11/westchester-residents-beware-astorinos-version-of-a-reformer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.choicematters.org/2011/11/westchester-residents-beware-astorinos-version-of-a-reformer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Items]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astorino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cld 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthy westchester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westchester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westhelp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choicematters.org/?p=1007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DISTRICT #3 has elected a truly ETHICALLY-CHALLENGED representative. His name, and Astorino&#8217;s hand picked candidate who he labeled a reformer, is Michael Smith. (Makes you question what kind of reform Astorino is looking for!!) It is essential that as we move forward voters keep a very sharp eye on Smith. Yes, Smith opposes abortion even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DISTRICT #3 has elected a truly ETHICALLY-CHALLENGED representative.<br />
His name, and Astorino&#8217;s hand picked candidate who he labeled a <em>reformer</em>, is Michael Smith.</strong><strong> (Makes you question what kind of reform Astorino is looking for!!)<br />
</strong><br />
<strong>I<em>t is essential</em></strong> that as we move forward voters keep a very sharp eye on Smith.</p>
<p>Yes, Smith opposes abortion even in cases of rape, incest or to save the life of the woman.<br />
<strong><br />
In addition, Smith has a very questionable history at best. He seems willing to do anything to win. Nothing is off limits.  </strong></p>
<p>To win this election, Smith ran ads about Legislator Nonna that were <em>intentionally </em>misleading&#8211;that&#8217;s not just our opinion but the findings of the non-partisan Fair Practices Campaign who found him guilty. Smith also apparently ran an equally offensive and untrue recorded phone call to voters on Election Day to scare them into voting for him. And that&#8217;s just the beginning.<br />
<strong><br />
Smith, as Board President of Valhalla School Board, actively supported and fought for a contract </strong><strong><em>the New York State Controller found to be illegal as did the New York State Supreme Court.<br />
</em></strong><em><br />
</em></p>
<h3>Printed on the <em><a href="http://et.ratepoint.com/aa9b433c4befaa7bbb5575869678a141/5522ff57358b0251cff65670b85d3af8" target="_blank">Valhalla Voice</a></em><em> </em>website, November 2, 2011<br />
&#8220;Mike Smith&#8217;s record speaks volumes&#8221;</h3>
<p>&#8220;As a taxpayer in the Valhalla school district I am still amused that Mr Smith is running as a tax cutter. He is anything but. In his first 3 years on the Valhalla BOE spending rose 21%. The increase one year before had been 8.8% so where were the cuts?</p>
<p>He is now opposing the $1 a year county lease for the children&#8217;s museum, but never opposed Valhalla&#8217;s $1 a year Easter Seals lease, the district lost $2.4 million on that deal.</p>
<p>When state auditors shut down the illegal Westhelp scam, Mike Smith voted to sue his own town to restart the illegal payments. He had no problem spending school district money on:</p>
<ul>
<li>Matching Grants to the Valhalla Schools Foundation even though it is illegal to fund private foundations with government money.</li>
<li>Two full time salaries for Kensico School Principal</li>
<li>Pay his own expense at a private school</li>
<li>Donations to Easter Seals, another private foundation.</li>
<li>Summer trips to the Grand Canyon</li>
<li>Trips to the opera</li>
<li>Dinners at trendy NYC restaurants</li>
<li>Adult Ice Skating at Rockefeller Center</li>
<li>Ocktoberfest at Bear Mountain</li>
<li><a href="http://et.ratepoint.com/672e95027772f7b1693a18fc212ee5d1/5522ff57358b0251cff65670b85d3af8" target="_blank">A moonlight booze cruise on the Hudson </a></li>
</ul>
<p>Despite Mr. Smith&#8217;s denials to the contrary, the Booze Cruise was on his watch, in August of 2006<br />
Here are quotes from the 2008 NY State audit of Mike&#8217;s Smith&#8217;s Valhalla school district finances:</p>
<p>“District officials did not maintain complete and accurate accounting records to facilitate the proper and timely monitoring of the WestHELP Grant. As a result, of the approximately $1.7 million expended for the Grant, approximately $456,000 was not expended in accordance with the Grant agreement, proposals or applicable laws”</p>
<p>“The [Valhalla] Board did not provide sufficient oversight over District financial operations”</p>
<p>“The District overpaid for the Business Administrator’s life insurance premiums by $38,500”</p>
<p>“Internal controls over payroll were not adequate”</p>
<p>“The District did not have adequate controls over the payroll process”</p>
<p>&#8216;District officials did not implement an effective system of internal controls to safeguard computerized data&#8217;”</p>
<p><em>Smith has proudly said that he stands by the contract. </em>That illegal support will now cost Valhalla School District residents over a million dollars. <strong>Smith&#8217;s willingness to stand by a clearly illegal contract should worry Westchester residents.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.choicematters.org/2011/11/westchester-residents-beware-astorinos-version-of-a-reformer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unofficial Election Results!</title>
		<link>http://www.choicematters.org/2011/11/an-unofficial-election-results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.choicematters.org/2011/11/an-unofficial-election-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Items]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anit-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astorino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choicematters.org/?p=993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was the Ultimate Battle against Goliath, and Goliath lost! We the Pro-Choice community and Choice Matters took on Astorino&#8217;s anti-choice machine and won! We have maintained a pro-choice majority on the Westchester County Board of Legislators, although we did sadly lose an important ally in District #3, John Nonna. As the Capital Tonight reported, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><strong>This was the <em>Ultimate</em> Battle against Goliath, and Goliath lost!</strong></div>
<div><strong>We the Pro-Choice community and Choice Matters took on Astorino&#8217;s anti-choice machine and won!</strong> We have maintained a pro-choice majority on the Westchester County Board of Legislators, although we did sadly lose an important ally in District #3, John Nonna.</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div><strong>As the Capital Tonight reported, Election Night was &#8220;Not A Good Night For Rob Astorino&#8221;</strong></div>
</div>
<div>Right-to-Life, anti-birth control  anti-sex education County Executive Rob Astorino vested heavily in this election even though his name was not on the ballot.He handpicked the candidates to target Democratic pro-choice incumbents.Astorino recruited his political consultant Bill O’Reilly to manage the campaign of his handpicked, rubber stamp, predominantly anti-choice candidates.Then Astorino found the big money for his campaign. He knew he wouldn&#8217;t find those anti-choice dollars in Westchester so he headed to Albany.According to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>,  the NYS GOP&#8211;the same anti-choice extremists who back the likes of Senator Skelos&#8211;invested in excess of $100,000 in Westchester County&#8217;s 2011 County legislature races.</p>
<p>Why? Apparently Astorino is considered <em>a rising star</em> and a possible challenger to Governor Cuomo in 2014. (<em>GOP Viewing Westchester as a Big Test</em>, 11/8/2011)</p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>The results are not yet official but here is the expected outcome for our pro-choice incumbents targeted by anti-choice extremist Rob Astorino:Peter Harckham, CLD #2  <strong>YES!!!</strong>John Nonna, CLD #3   Sadly no.Mike Kaplowitz, CLD #4   <strong>YES!!!</strong>Bill Ryan, CLD #5    <strong>YES!!!</strong></p>
<p>Judy Myers, CLD #7  <strong>YES!!!</strong></p>
<p>Plus 2 Open Seats that We Won<br />
that were previously held by pro-choice legislators:</p>
<p>Catherine Borgia, CLD #9  <strong>YES!!!</strong></p>
<p>Virginia Perez, CLD #17  <strong>YES!!!<br />
</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;" align="center"><strong>These legislators are</strong> <strong>100% pro-choice. </strong><strong><br />
</strong><strong>They protect</strong> our women, children, and families. <strong><br />
</strong><strong>They understand</strong> the importance of our clinics, childcare, and health centers.</p>
<div>
<div>It looks like both of Choice Matters&#8217; two endorsed pro-choice Supreme Court candidates for the 9th Judicial District, Robert DiBella and Paul Marx, won!!!</div>
</div>
<div>Sadly, fantastic pro-choice challenger John Fitzpatrick, in #10, <em>almost </em>succeeded in defeating an incumbent who even in cases of rape, incest or to save the life of the woman opposes abortion. (According to the Right to Life Committee, the incumbent  also supports passing a law to ban gay marriage.) Unfortunately, it appears at this time that Fitzpatrick is behind by 39 votes. <strong></strong> Also candidates in the open seat in District #6, Dan Brakewood, and the challenger in District #1, Mike Kane, were unable to come out on top of the  anti-choice opposition.</div>
<div><strong>NOTE: It is our job to make sure they have powerful pro-choice  support next time!</strong><strong>* When the Pro-Choice Community Votes, We Win *</strong></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.choicematters.org/2011/11/an-unofficial-election-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet Westchester&#8217;s Own Pro-Choice Male Brigade!</title>
		<link>http://www.choicematters.org/2011/10/meet-westchesters-own-pro-choice-male-brigade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.choicematters.org/2011/10/meet-westchesters-own-pro-choice-male-brigade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astorino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brakewood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[childcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fitzpatrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harckham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaplowitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planned parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-choice brigade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westchester]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choicematters.org/?p=972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We Must Protect Our Rights and Westchester by Electing Strong, Independent Leaders!  Meet Westchester&#8217;s Pro-Choice  Male Brigade!! &#8211;DISTRICT #2 Bedford, Lewisboro, Mt. Kisco, North Salem, Pound Ridge &#38; part of Somers. Peter Harckham was first elected to the County Legislature in 2007 and has served as Majority Leader for the past two years. Harckham has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><strong>We Must Protect Our Rights and Westchester </strong></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong>by Electing Strong, Independent Leaders!  </strong></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><strong>Meet Westchester&#8217;s Pro-Choice  Male Brigade!!</strong></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 10.5pt;"><br />
</span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: Times; font-size: 10.5pt;">&#8211;</span><strong><strong>DISTRICT #2</strong></strong><br />
Bedford, Lewisboro, Mt. Kisco, North Salem, Pound Ridge &amp; part of Somers.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong>Peter Harckham</strong> was first elected to the County Legislature in 2007 and has served as Majority Leader for the past two years. Harckham has proven himself to be a  strong ally who is able to work across party lines to build consensus without compromising the very values for which he was elected. Harckham is also endorsed by the NYS League  of Conservation Voters. <strong>His opponent</strong> promises to be a Yes-Man for Astorino and oppose sex ed and contraception for teens!</div>
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong>&#8211;DISTRICT #3</strong><strong><br />
</strong>North  Castle, Pleasantville &amp; Unincorporated Mt. Pleasant &amp; parts of Briarcliff Manor, Sleepy Hollow and Unincorporated Greenburgh.<strong></strong></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong>John Nonna</strong> has distinguished himself as a great legal mind and a friend to Choice. As a true public servant throughout his career—currently as a County Legislator, and previously as Mayor, Trustee and Judge—John Nonna has stood up for women’s rights.  <strong>Nonna’s opponent</strong> is an anti-choice extemist, seeking the Right to Life Party endorsement and <em>opposes abortion even in cases of rape, incest or to save the life of the woman!</em>In addition, Nonna&#8217;s opponent has no experience in government.<strong></strong></div>
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong>&#8211;DISTRICT #4</strong><strong><br />
</strong>New Castle &amp; parts of Somers &amp; Yorktown.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong>Mike Kaplowitz</strong> has proven himself to be a strong supporter of the pro-choice community. His position as Budget and Appropriations Committee Chairman made Kaplowitz keenly aware of the role the County plays in the fight to protect women’s reproductive rights. That understanding has served the women of Westchester well.  <strong>Kaplowitz&#8217; anti-choice opponent</strong> is endorsed by Right to Life  Party and <em>opposes abortion even in cases of rape, incest or to save the life of the woman</em> and supports a constitutional amendment outlawing gay marriage.<br />
<strong>&#8211;DISTRICT #5</strong><strong><br />
</strong>The Village of Scarsdale &amp; part of Harrison &amp; part of White Plains.<strong><br />
Bill </strong><strong>Ryan</strong> has been an active and vocal advocate for Choice since his early days in the NYS Assembly. In his first campaign for the County Legislature, he pledged to continue fighting for a woman’s right to choose and he has done so without fail. Ryan has “more faith in women making the right decision for themselves than in government making it for them…” and believes, “a woman’s right to choose is absolute and should not be subject to legislation.” Ryan also serves on the Large Urban County Caucus in the National Association of Counties He is one of 35 county officials representing over 140 million people, living in the 100 largest counties in America, on matters before the federal government. <strong>Ryan’s opponent</strong>, although rated pro-choice, will not commit to supporting the clinic access bill that protects women as they enter and leave reproductive health centers. S<em>he says she’s a novice whose ideas are still cooking</em>—but in reality, she has been politically active for years and served on Astorino’s transition team. Choice Matters’ choice is Bill Ryan!</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<p><strong> </strong><strong><br />
New Pro-Choice Voices for the County Legislature!<br />
&#8211;DISTRICT #1</strong><br />
Buchanan &amp; parts of Yorktown, City of Peekskill &amp; Unincorporated Cortlandt.<br />
<strong>Michael Kane</strong><strong> </strong>is a strong voice for reducing the size of county government responsibly. His commitment to women and families makes him particularly aware of the importance of childcare to working mothers, thus, his refusal to cut childcare funding irresponsibly because &#8220;every dollar cut from childcare costs Westchester taxpayers $3 more in food stamps, $5 in welfare, and $20 in shelter costs [because irrational childcare subsidy cuts force working women into unemployment.]&#8221; <strong>Kane&#8217;s anti-choice opponent</strong> is a rubber stamp for RTL Astorino&#8217;s anti-family anti-woman agenda.<strong><br />
&#8211;DISTRICT #6</strong><br />
Rye Brook, Port Chester, &amp; part of Harrison<strong>.</strong><strong><br />
</strong><strong>Daniel Brakewood</strong> is committed to women’s reproductive health. As a current Port Chester trustee, Brakewood has proven himself to be an independent voice for his constituents. In contrast, <strong>Brakewood&#8217;s anti-choice opponent</strong> has said, even in his own literature, that he will be a [guaranteed] vote for [RTL] Astorino. That is not independent! Choice Matters endorses Daniel Brakewood.<strong><br />
&#8211;DISTRICT #10<br />
</strong>Tuckahoe &amp; Unincorporated Eastchester, &amp; part of New Rochelle. <strong><br />
John Fitzpatrick </strong>has served the people of Westchester as Mayor of Tuckahoe for two terms, Village Trustee, Planning Commissioner and Police Commissioner. He has made environmentally sustainable initiatives a trademark of his administration. He is pro-choice, fiscally conservative and an advocate for housing. <strong>Fitzpatrick&#8217;s opponent</strong> who is endorsed by the Right to Life Party, is an extremist who opposes abortion <em>even in cases of rape, incest or to save the life of the woman</em>. She also supports a constitutional amendment outlawing gay marriage.</p>
</div>
<table id="el-15" class="inline-builder-document-block" width="159" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="inline-builder-document-block-content"></td>
<td width="10"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom" width="10" height="15"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.choicematters.org/2011/10/meet-westchesters-own-pro-choice-male-brigade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking News: The War on Women Hits Westchester!</title>
		<link>http://www.choicematters.org/2011/10/breaking-news-the-war-on-women-hits-westchester/</link>
		<comments>http://www.choicematters.org/2011/10/breaking-news-the-war-on-women-hits-westchester/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Items]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astorino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carmen gomez goldberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[county legislator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gelfarb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[konig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marcotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michaelis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westchester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westchester county board of legislators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.choicematters.org/?p=966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right to Life County Executive Cuts Funding for Contraception for Teens, Well-Baby Care and Sex Education This is outrageous! Less than three months after the Department of Health and Human Services announced that contraception is so important that it is being designated preventive care, in accordance with the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center">Right to Life County Executive<br />
Cuts Funding for Contraception for Teens, Well-Baby Care and Sex Education</p>
<p><em>This is outrageous!</em> Less than three months after the Department of Health and Human Services announced that contraception is <em>so important</em> that it is being designated <em>preventive</em> <em>care</em>, in accordance with the recommendations of<em> </em>the Institute of Medicine, and joining the list of key services such as mammograms, cervical cancer screenings, prenatal care, well-woman visits, and gestational diabetes screenings, Astorino puts his right-to-life, anti-birth-control, far-right mentality into action, attacking our teenagers’ health and rights.</p>
<p>Nothing seems more like preventive care than contraception!</p>
<p><strong>Why is Astorino doing this?</strong> This is clearly <em>not</em> about reducing our taxes or about jobs.</p>
<p><strong>Just like the tea baggers in Congress</strong> who are seizing every opportunity to attack women’s reproductive rights, Astorino has chosen this moment, when Westchester has sky rocketing unemployment and depleted tax revenues to put his personal anti-choice tea party stamp on our county.</p>
<p>Simply not funding contraceptives and not teaching sex ed does <em>not</em> make sex go away. Instead, it will most likely lead to a dramatic increase in teen pregnancies.</p>
<p>When these babies are then born there will be no well-baby care available because Astorino has cut that too.</p>
<p><strong>Astorino is the true embodiment of the right-to-life philosophy</strong>: <em>care about the fetus, but when it&#8217;s born, throw it and its mother under the bus.</em></p>
<p><strong>Who is most effected by Astorino’s actions? </strong>Anyone who  utilizes any one of Westchester County’s community health centers—teenagers, the unemployed, the working poor, those without health insurance.</p>
<p><strong>Who won’t it affect?</strong> Astorino and his financially secure friends.</p>
<p align="center"><strong>On Election Day </strong><strong><br />
<strong>Astorino Wants Your Help In This Attack </strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Astorino has </strong><em><strong>hand-picked</strong></em><strong> candidates to challenge incumbents.</strong> <em>The Astorino gang </em>have all sworn their allegiance to him as attested to at the press conference held on October 7<sup>th</sup>. On the steps of the County office building and in their own press releases, these candidates have said they will be a [guaranteed] vote for the Astorino agenda and that they share his [governing] philosophy more than 99% of the time.</p>
<p>That means they too believe in outsourcing jobs including the Community Health Centers, as well as cutting funding for contraceptives for teens, well-baby care and sex ed.</p>
<p><strong>Astorino and his gang are committed to creating a </strong><em><strong>sick Westchester</strong></em><strong>, not a healthy one!</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;" align="center">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.choicematters.org/2011/10/breaking-news-the-war-on-women-hits-westchester/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

